BOGOFILTER VS SPAMASSASSIN PRO

Furthermore, unlike competitors, Rspamd provides a lot of other checks and features. If I go to Edit > Preferences > Mail Preferences > Junk theres a box 'Junk filtering software' where I can chose between Bogofilter and SpamAssassin. The database of tokens, containing the tokens learnt, their count of occurrences in ham and spam, and the timestamp when the token was last seen in a message. Both arent listed by my Evolutions plugins too. sa-learn and the other parts of SpamAssassins Bayesian learner, use a set of persistent database files to store the learnt tokens, as follows. Hence, it’s quality is very close to Bogofilters one. Subject: Re: Evolution Setup bogofilter or spamassassin Date: Mon, 20:14:20 +0200 Im using 3.10.4 on Arch Linux. I have not included SpamAssassin into the comparison since it uses naive Bayes classifier similar to Bogofilter. Re: KMail did not match Thunderbird by inspired by art. Bogofilter works really good, is pretty fast (coded in c, not perl like SA). There's a useful FAQ at, and if you decide to go with bogofilter I would recommend joining the mailing list - it's low traffic and very helpful. incluyeron filtros anti-spam disponibles libremente como referencia: SpamAssassin, Bogofilter, SpamBayes y SpamProbe, as como tambin un clasificador. Dspam and Bogofilter both require about 30 seconds to learn. I used spamassassin for about 1 year but lost my settings for it that is why I switched to bogofilter. I have friends that welcome mail that I immediately delete. If you don't train, you will not get good results. score BOGOFILTER 5.0 Presto This plugs almost all the holes in SpamAssassins defense, and uses SpamAssassins auto-whitelist (youve got it turned on, right) to protect against false positives. is that correct? did i miss something?īayesian filtering depends on learning what you consider to be ham or spam. header BOGOFILTER X-Spam-Bogofilter /yes/ describe BOGOFILTER Message has too many bogons.

BOGOFILTER VS SPAMASSASSIN PRO

Bogofilter není íen s výchozí sadou kritérií pro rozpoznání nevyádané poty, take po instalaci automaticky nic nenajde. Of course this is a simplification, but for a normal user who just wants to sort out his mail with the spam and ham buttons it should be true.Ĭan anybody give me some advice on this, please. SpamAssassin pracuje pomocí sady peddefinovaných pravidel, take dokáe urit nevyádanou potu pímoarým zpsobem. Spamassassin: +less training necessary (rules) | -slow I can't decide on which filter to use - most of the articles comparing the two are so old that SA didn't have bayesian filtering at that time.īogofilter: +fast | -more training necessary

Bogofilter vs spamassassin